According to the nine-count complaint, all female plaintiffs were prescribed Zoloft while they were pregnant and all children from these pregnancies were born with major medical defects, including heart defects. The plaintiffs allege Pfizer was aware the drugs could cause serious problems to developing fetuses but covered up the evidence.

Zoloft is in a class of antidepressants known as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or SSRIs. They are among the most prescribed drugs in the United States and include other brand name drugs such as Paxil, Celexa, Lexapro and Prozac. All SSRIs are currently categorized as Category C pregnancy drugs except Paxil, which was recently downgraded to a Category D drug based on studies that showed a definite link between its use during pregnancy and birth defects.

The complaint cites several studies that SSRIs double the risk of heart defects in children. Based on those studies, the plaintiffs claim that Pfizer must have known that the drugs were dangerous to use during pregnancy. They allege that the drug lacked proper warnings that would have given parents and their doctors ample opportunity to weigh the drug’s risks against its benefits.

The parents accuse Pfizer of negligence, fraud, misrepresentation and a breach of implied warranties. They also claim that the drug company violated Consumer Protection Laws. The plaintiffs are asking for actual and compensatory damages.

Source: Madison-St. Clair Record

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › Parents file birth defect lawsuit against Zoloft

Clinical trials

The British Medical Journal recently released several papers looking into the problem of unpublished data, including one study from Yale University, which found that fewer than half of the 635 the clinical trials funded by the National Institutes of Health were actually published in medical journals within 30 months of trial completion.

Drug companies that delay publishing these findings or even deliberately hide trial data are breaching their ethical duty, says lead researcher Joseph Ross. “The evidence we publish shows that the current situation is a disservice to research participants, patients, health systems, and the whole endeavor of clinical medicine,” he said.

Drug companies have often been caught withholding data, especially with drugs that are widely prescribed and bring in billions in profits. Drugmaker Grunenthal, now part of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and Sanofi, is currently being sued by 13 Americans who were born with birth defects after their mothers took the drug Thalidomide to treat morning sickness. The lawsuit claims that the drug company hid results of studies that would have revealed the drug caused birth defects.

Now, makers of the most commonly prescribed antidepressants are feeling some of the same wrath. New studies have linked selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) to birth defects, particularly of the heart and lungs. Women who took the drug during pregnancy and gave birth to babies with these serious birth defects allege the drug companies did not reveal just how dangerous the drugs were to developing fetuses.

It wouldn’t be the first time these SSRI drug companies reportedly tried to cover up data that could hurt sales. In 2006, a U.S. court found drug maker GSK guilty of promoting Paxil or Paxil CR for children and adolescents while withholding and concealing information about the medication’s safety and effectiveness for minors. The lawsuit stemmed from a consumer advocate protest against GSK, which alleged that consumers were not sufficiently warned in advance of the drug’s side effects and addictive properties.

“Most clinicians assume that the complex regulatory systems that govern human research ensure that (clinical data) is relevant, reliable and properly disseminated,” Dr. Richard Lehman from Oxford University and the British Medical Journal’s Dr. Elizabeth Loder told the Daily Mail. “It generally comes as a shock to clinicians, and certainly to the public, to learn that this is far from the case.”

Sources:
Daily Mail
Wikipedia
The Dr. Rath Health Foundation

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › Do drug companies cover up data about drugs’ safety, efficacy?

For some drugs, continuing to take them during pregnancy isn’t an issue. But other drugs have been shown to cause serious complications. Women may have to choose between continuing on a medication or having a baby. Otherwise, the baby could be at serious risk.

Antidepressants are one of the most prescribed medications in the country, and the most popular antidepressants include a category of drugs known as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or SSRIs. These drugs include the brand names Paxil, Zoloft, Celexa, Lexapro and Prozac.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is quickly learning more and more about these medications and their potential effects on unborn children. In fact, the FDA recently reclassified Paxil as a Category D pregnancy drug after data showed that some women who took Paxil delivered babies with birth defects. Newer studies also suggest that other SSRI drugs may be just as dangerous.

This new information has also resulted in lawsuits against the makers of some SSRIs for not adequately warning women of the potential for birth defects when taking the medication during pregnancy.

The bottom line, Ashton says, is understanding the risks and benefits with any medication, especially if you become pregnant.

Source: The Safety Report

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › Pregnant women should discuss prescription meds with their doctors

The plaintiffs allege that their children were born with varying birth defects including heart defects, neural tube defects, gastroschisis, omphalocele, craniosynostosis, cleft lip, club foot, anal atresia, and limb reduction defects. They blame the drug.

“Pfizer knew or should have known that Zoloft crosses the placenta, which could have important implications for the developing fetus,” the lawsuit states. The plaintiffs allege that Pfizer instead marketed Zoloft as the safest antidepressant to take during pregnancy.

Zoloft is in a class of antidepressants known as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or SSRIs. Other drugs in this class include Paxil, Celexa, Lexapro, and Prozac. All SSRIs were classified as Category C pregnancy drugs, meaning that no studies have proven risks to developing fetuses. However, recent studies proving Paxil causes birth defects have required the reclassification of Paxil to a Category D pregnancy drug.

SSRIs are among the most prescribed medications in the country, and drug companies make millions off these drugs. The plaintiffs in the Zoloft lawsuit claim that Pfizer kept reports of complications in fetuses under wraps to protect its empire. The drug maker disputes these claims.

The lawsuit alleges strict products liability, breach of express warranty, negligence, misrepresentation by omission, negligent misrepresentation, fraud and misrepresentation, fraud by concealment, violation of consumer protection laws, and breach of implied warranties. The lawsuit seeks unspecified compensatory damages, statutory remedies, a disgorgement of profits and pre-judgment interests.

Attorneys with Beasley Allen Law Firm are currently investigating cases of birth defects allegedly associated with Zoloft and any other SSRI.

Source: The Madison St. Clair Record

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › Parents file birth defects lawsuit against makers of Zoloft

GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)

So far, GSK has paid more than $1 billion to settle patent lawsuits alleging Paxil caused birth defects in some women who used the drug during pregnancy. The settlements averaged about $1 million per claim. GSK continues to settle lawsuits on birth defects claims.

The legal woes led the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to order GSK to change Paxil’s label to indicate a risk for birth defects when used during pregnancy. Newer studies are beginning to suggest that other antidepressants in the same class – known as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or SSRIs – may be just as dangerous to developing fetuses as Paxil. Other drugs in this class include Zoloft, Celexa, Lexapro and Prozac.

GSK’s multi-billion dollar fund not only is designed to resolve issues with Paxil, but also with its type 2 diabetes drug Avandia. The FDA recently severely restricted use of the drug after studies showed Avandia puts users at risk for fatal heart attacks.

The FDA recently warned about another type 2 diabetes drug, Actos, manufactured by Takeda, after studies showed that drug may put users at risk for bladder cancer.

Source: Business Week

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › GSK socks away billions to cover legal costs with Paxil, Avandia

This month, 13 Americans are suing Grunethal GmbH and companies now merged into GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi, claiming the drug companies conspired to withhold the results of studies that showed their drug Thalidomide, used to treat morning sickness in pregnant women, caused birth defects, including missing and malformed limbs.

The plaintiffs were all born with birth defects between 1957 and 1962. The drug companies claim that the birth defects associated with Thalidomide were known in Europe, and that they could not have happened in the United States because the drug was only used in a limited clinical trial. The drug companies allege that the link between birth defects and Thalidomide was not known until 1961, however the lawsuits claim the companies were aware of the risks as early as 1955.

It’s taken 50 years for the victims of Thalidomide to seek justice, but lawsuits are already mounting against manufacturers of another class of drugs that studies show may cause serious birth defects – selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or SSRIs. These antidepressants are among the most prescribed medications in America, and many women are under the belief that these drugs are safe to use during pregnancy.

The truth is drug companies do receive complaints about their medication but are often slow to share the news. For example, women who used the SSRI Paxil during pregnancy and delivered babies with serious brain, heart and lung defects found out too late that their babies could have been spared injury if only they had been made aware of the possible risks associated with the drug.

It took several complaints for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to order stronger warnings on Paxil use during pregnancy. Many of those mothers are waiting for their day in court.

Source: Business Week

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › Drug companies should not hide risk for birth defects

The Hodges claim that before Susan became pregnant, Pfizer knew of the dangerous birth defects associated with using Zoloft during pregnancy from preclinical studies and subsequent published studies that confirmed the risks. Yet, the drug company took no action to adequately warn of the risks or fix the problem. Instead, the company “concealed, suppressed, and failed to disclose the dangers,” according to the Hodges’ lawsuit.

Zoloft is in a class of antidepressants known as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or SSRIs. Other drugs in this class include Paxil, Celexa, Lexapro and Prozac. All SSRIs except Paxil are classified as Category C drugs, meaning there are no sufficient studies to rule out the risk of birth defects. Paxil was recently re-classified as a Category D drug after studies proved using the drug caused birth defects, including neural tube defects.

The lawsuit claims that “Pfizer had the knowledge, the means, and the duty to provide the medical community and the consuming public with stronger warning regarding the association between Zoloft and congenital birth defects … through all means necessary, including, but not limited to, labeling, continuing education, symposiums, posters, sales calls to doctors, advertisements, and promotional materials, etc. Pfizer breached this duty.”

The Hodges seek punitive damages for product liability, negligence, fraud, breach of warranty, unjust enrichment, false advertising and wrongful death.

Source: Opposing Views

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › Family claims Pfizer covered up birth defects risks with Zoloft

The Hodges baby was born with a defect known as anencephaly, in which a large part of the brain and skull are missing. The condition is almost always fatal.

Zoloft is an antidepressant in a drug class known as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). Other drugs in this class include Paxil, Celexa, Lexapro and Prozac. Almost all SSRIs are classified as Category C drugs, meaning that there is not enough evidence to determine whether the drugs cause birth defects.

Paxil is the only SSRI that is not classified as a Category C drug. It was recently reclassified as a Category D drug, meaning the drug has been proven to cause birth defects in humans and should only be used if the benefits to the mother outweigh the risks. The reclassification of Paxil was the result of new studies that showed the drug increased the risk of heart, brain, spinal cord and lung defects in newborns if used during pregnancy.

The Hodges claim Zoloft carries similar dangers and that before Susan Hodges began taking the drug Pfizer knew of the serious birth defects associated with Zoloft’s use during pregnancy from preclinical studies and subsequent published studies. Despite this, they say, Pfizer took no action to adequately warn consumers of the potential risks. Instead, the company took measures to conceal the dangers, their lawsuit alleges.

The Hodges are seeking punitive damages for product liability, negligence, fraud, breach of warranty, unjust enrichment, false adverting, and wrongful death.

Source: Courthouse News Service

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › Parents claim Zoloft caused newborn’s fatal neural tube defect

Paxil is in a class of drugs known as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or SSRIs. Other drugs in this class include Zoloft, Celexa, Lexapro and Prozac. When Paxil was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1992 for the treatment of depression and anxiety disorders, it was listed as a Category C pregnancy drug, meaning that there have been no studies to show whether the drug could harm fetuses. However, reports of birth defects including those affecting the heart, lungs and other organs, from women who took the drug while pregnant were enough for the FDA to require the drug be reclassified as a Category D drug, meaning studies have proven that use during pregnancy can cause birth defects.

Since the drug was approved, more than 600 cases alleging birth defects linked to Paxil have been filed. The first trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiffs and an award of $2.5 million in compensatory damages for the family of Lyam Kilker, who was born with three cardiac birth defects after his mother took Paxil while pregnant.

While Paxil is the only SSRI classified as a Category D drug, newer studies are beginning to question the safety of other SSRIs on fetuses, particularly Zoloft. Two studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine found a statistically significant increased risk of various birth defects possibly linked to Zoloft. Canadian and Swedish studies backed up that claim, singling out persistent pulmonary hypertension as a potentially fatal condition from SSRI exposure.

Animal experiments have also shown that not only do SSRIs pass through the placental barrier, they have direct effects on the developing neural crest and brachial arch cells that migrate in a very early developing embryo to form all of the major organ systems in babies. When neural crest cells don’t migrate properly or they’re interfered with by an agent such as Paxil or Zoloft, many problems can arise.

More and more lawsuits filed against makers of SSRIs are holding these drug companies accountable for their actions in response to these studies, and their responsibility to adequately warn users of the potential dangers of their drugs.

Source:
Dissident Voice/Bloomberg

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › Paxil lawsuits have cost drug maker $1 billion

Pregnant women

The study involved nearly 3,000 women who gave birth in Washington state. Researchers found that those who started taking antidepressants known as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or SSRIs, in the second or third trimester were nearly five times more likely to give birth prematurely compared to pregnant women not on the medication.

SSRIs are prescribed for the treatment of depression and anxiety disorders and include drugs such as Zoloft (sertraline), Paxil (paroxetine), and Prozac (fluoxetine).

The study raises more concerns about the safety of SSRIs during pregnancy. A New England Journal of Medicine study found that women who took SSRIs during their third trimester were six times more likely to deliver babies born with persistent pulmonary hypertension (PPHN), a serious lung condition, than those who did not take SSRI during their third trimester.

More studies have linked SSRIs to omphalocele, a birth defect where the intestine or other abdominal organs protrude from the naval. Other birth defects that have been reported include cleft palate, club foot, spina bifida, anal atresia, and congenital heart defects.

Beasley Allen Law Firm is currently investigating cases of birth defects and birth complications  allegedly caused by SSRI use during pregnancy. These lawsuits may provide the financial resources necessary for a lifetime of care or to help pay for medical procedures for babies that may have been affected by the drugs.

Source: American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › Study links SSRIs to preterm delivery and birth complications

The Schultzes and the Rawkins spoke to BC Local News in hopes of raising awareness of the dangers of using SSRIs like Effexor during pregnancy. They hope women who are considering becoming pregnant and doctors both heed their warning.

“The pathologists who performed autopsies on both of our sons brought this to both of our attention. The drug was present in both of their systems and their are hundreds of reported adverse reactions in newborns related to these drugs, including over a dozen cases of infant death, which the coroner was absolutely wrong in saying that infant death doesn’t occur,” Amery commented. “Health Canada published very strong warnings in 2004 and 2006 that never made their way to doctors or the end consumer. I don’t believe that we will ever prove causation, but the existence of having a birthing protocol and monitoring of these exposed babies certainly could have saved my Matthew’s life.”

Effexor and all other SSRI medications except Paxil are listed as Pregnancy Category C drugs, meaning that either studies in animals have revealed adverse affects on the fetus and there are no controlled studies in women, or studies in women and animals are not available. These drugs are only given if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus.

Paxil is the only SSRI listed as a Category D drug, meaning that there is positive evidence of human fetal risk when used during pregnancy, but the drug may be acceptable if it is needed in a life-threatening situation or for a serious disease where safer drugs cannot be used or are ineffective. New studies that showed Paxil was more lethal than other SSRIs prompted its category downgrade, but some people, including the Schultzes and the Rawkins, worry that other drugs in the same class may pose similar dangers when used during pregnancy.

“We are fighting to protect babies. If a person who knows the facts about these drugs still wants to take them, then power to them. But it’s the gross ignorance around them that we are trying to change. Doctors will tell you they’re safe, and not to worry about any warnings that you may hear. But they don’t know. The vast majority of doctors only have knowledge of drugs either from a drug sales rep that visits them at their office or from a Continuing Medical Education (CME) Seminar that is sponsored by a drug company, and usually somewhere nice like a golf resort or Hawaii,” Amery continued.

“Drug companies do not put patient safety first, they put shareholder equity first. Plain and simple. Death and debilitating side effects are the norm for a drug company to operate. It is collateral damage. In the last decade alone, pharmaceutical companies have settled billions of dollars in lawsuits. Once settled, those injured by dangerous drugs are silenced and their stories are removed from the public record. It’s the cost of doing business for a drug company. It makes sense to pay out 1 billion dollars in a class action settlement if a drug makes you 2 billion a year in profit. simple economics.

“And our Healthcare system, notably Health Canada is powerless to stop this from happening,” Amery said.

Source: BC Local News

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › Families warn of dangers with using SSRIs during pregnancy

GlaxoSmithKline

Paxil is a type of medication known as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and is prescribed for the treatment of depression and anxiety disorder. Other brands of SSRIs include Zoloft, Lexapro, Prosac and Celexa. Paxil is considered more toxic to unborn babies than any other SSRI, and is listed as a Category D drug. All other SSRI drugs are Category C drugs, meaning they are safer for use during pregnancy.

Since 2005, studies have linked Paxil to birth defects including cardiac (heart) defects, pulmonary (lung) defects, neural tube defects (brain and spinal cord), craniosynostosis (abnormally shaped skull), infant omphalocele (abdominal wall defects), club foot (one or both feet turn downward and inward), and anal atresia (complete or partial closure of the anus).

Newer studies also have linked the antidepressant to an increased risk of Neonatal Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension (PPHN).

More recent studies have also linked serious birth defects with other types of SSRIs, which has led some people to question whether all SSRIs should be labeled as Category D drugs and avoided during pregnancy.

Anyone who has taken an SSRI during pregnancy and delivered a child with a birth defect may have a case against the drug’s maker.

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › Millions awarded to women in Paxil, birth defects lawsuits

What concerns doctors is that many of these medications have never been studied in pregnant women to determine if use during pregnancy increases birth defect risk. This gray area puts the decision of whether to use medications in the hands of women and their doctors. Often, drug companies rely on information from animal trials when data from human trials is not available. But that can be misleading.

Such is the case with Paxil. Once labeled as a Category C drug, the drug was not associated with birth defect risks and thus was thought somewhat safe to use at least during the later months of pregnancy. However, this was proven to be false after the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) began receiving reports from women who took the antidepressant and had babies born with defects, in particular heart defects. Lawsuits soon followed.

Paxil has since been classified as a Category D drug, one that is not deemed safe to use during pregnancy. But all other antidepressants in the same class, known as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), still are classified as a Category C drug, and are still prescribed to pregnant women suffering from depression and anxiety disorder. Studies show that these drugs, which include the brand Zoloft, are just as dangerous to developing fetuses.

Women who are pregnant or are considering becoming pregnant should discuss with their doctors whether the risks and benefits of the drugs they take in order to determine whether they are safe for their unborn babies.

Source: Fox News

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › Most pregnant women taking medication despite possible risks

“To say the least, I was absolutely distraught with this news. I thought this was something that I did … because I stayed on the Paxil for selfish reasons,” Beverly said. Despite the heartbreaking loss, Beverly and her husband were ready to try again to get pregnant. Her e-mail to GSK continued, “I don’t want to stop taking my miracle pill. But, then again, if there is a chance that this might hurt or affect the baby, I want to know upfront. And I will somehow stop taking it for the time being.

“Please contact me as soon as possible. Please don’t forget about me.”

GSK never responded. Three weeks later, Beverly sent another e-mail, this time asking specifically, “I was asking to see if you have any or are in the process of any clinical trials for women who are currently on Paxil and pregnant. I wanted to find out information to see how many women were on Paxil during pregnancy and if they were able to successfully have healthy babies.”

Five days later, Beverly got a response. GSK attached a copy of its current product information for Paxil, and then suggested she contact her physician or pharmacist with any questions.

Eight years later, the first Paxil birth defect trial resulted in a $2.5 million verdict against GSK. Since then, hundreds of lawsuits have been filed against GSK, and the FDA downgraded Paxil’s status from a Category C to a Category D drug, indicating clinical trials showed the drug caused birth defects in developing fetuses.

Paxil, an antidepressant in a class of drugs known as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or SSRIs, is the only SSRI listed as a Category D drug. But new studies suggest that Zoloft, another SSRI, and others in the class, may be just as dangerous to fetuses when used by mothers during pregnancy.

Beasley Allen Law Firm is currently investigating cases where SSRIs may have caused birth defects.

*Name changed
Source: Unite for Life

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › GSK avoided questions about safety of Paxil during pregnancy

Lyam’s parents filed suit against GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) claiming the drug company failed to adequately warn users of the risks associated with using Paxil while pregnant. The trial resulted in a landmark $2.5 million verdict against the pharmaceutical company.

Hundreds of more lawsuits were filed against GSK, and for the second quarter of 2010, GSK announced legal charges of about $2.4 billion. Soon, lawsuits against other antidepressants began to surface suggesting other antidepressants in the class were just as likely to cause birth defects.

Paxil has since been downgraded from a Category C drug to a Category D. Category D means that studies in pregnant women have demonstrated risk to the fetus. Paxil is in a class of antidepressants known as SSRIs, or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

All other SSRIs are currently listed as Category C drugs, meaning the drugs have been shown to harm fetuses in animal studies but have not been adequately studied in humans. With Category C medications, doctors and patients must decide if the benefits are greater than the risks. However, new studies suggest that other types of SSRIs may be more dangerous to developing fetuses than previously thought.

Pregnant women or women considering pregnancy should discuss with their doctors any concerns they have about SSRIs and birth defects, and whether the benefits of taking the drug outweigh the possible risks to the fetus.

Source: Unite for Life

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › Other SSRIs may be just as dangerous as Paxil to fetuses

The family sued the company in state court in Philadelphia for failing to warn consumers of the possible risks of taking the medication during pregnancy, according to the family’s attorney Karen Barth Menzies.

The family is seeking unspecified damages.

Source: Laywers USA

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › First Paxil birth defect lawsuit filed

The lawsuit, filed in Pennsylvania state court, is seeking unspecified damages for failing to warn pregnant women about the risks of taking Paxil.

During the last month of her pregnancy, Vasquez learned, while receiving an ultrasound to determine the sex of her baby, that there was something wrong with his heart.

Since then, Adrian has undergone three open-heart surgeries and now has a pacemaker.

The seriousness of these birth defects is such that, at the very first sign of danger, GSK should have issued a strong warning, said attorney Karen Barth Menzies, who is representing the family.

Adrian will need repeated heart surgeries as he continues to grow and may need artificial replacement valves, and perhaps eventually a heart transplant. His prognosis is unclear, she said.

Menzies added that with 40,000 pregnant women nationwide taking antidepressants, thousands of babies are at risk.

Source: Lawyers USA

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › Paxil Maker Sued Over Child Born with Severe Birth Defects