The new study, conducted by researchers with the University of Mississippi Medical Center, focused on the pre- and postnatal effects of laboratory rats after exposure to the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) citalopram, known by the brand name Celexa. The study results backed up findings of recent research that linked SSRI use during pregnancy to developmental disorders such as autistic spectrum disorders. Researchers also noted significant changes in brain development.

SSRIs are among the most prescribed medication in the United States and include brand names such as Celexa, Paxil, Zoloft, Lexapro and Prozac. There have been few studies to determine the safety of SSRIs during pregnancy, but new studies are shedding light into the dangers.

A recent study showed a definite risk of birth defects – including heart, brain and spinal cord defects – with the use of Paxil during pregnancy, which resulted in stronger warnings on the drug’s label and it being classified as a Category D pregnancy drug. Newer studies, such as that conducted by the University of Mississippi, are calling into question the safety of all other SSRIs.

Ultimately, the authors of the University of Mississippi study noted that the study stresses the importance of balanced serotonin levels, particularly during fetal development. “These findings indicate … that fetal/infant exposure to SSRIs should be examined in humans, particularly those with developmental dysfunction, such as autism.”

In a statement to the press, Dr. Thomas R. Insel, director of the National Institute of Mental Health, said of this latest research, “These studies will help to balance the mental health needs of pregnant mothers with possible increased risk to their offspring.”

Source: OBGYN.net

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › New study links SSRIs to developmental disorders, autism

It was four years ago, and studies were beginning to show just how dangerous Paxil is to developing fetuses. The drug was linked to serious birth defects of the heart and lungs as well as neural tube defects. Those studies recently resulted in the reclassification of Paxil from a Category C to a Category D drug – a rating given by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to inform doctors and patients of birth defects associated with certain drugs.

Paxil is in a class of antidepressants known as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or SSRIs. They are among the most prescribed drugs in the country. Paxil is the only SSRI classified as a Category D drug. All other SSRIs, such as Zoloft, Celexa, Lexapro, and Prozac, are classified as Category C drugs. The difference between the two categories is that studies prove that Category D drugs cause birth defects in humans, whereas with Category C drugs, there is not enough evidence to rule out the risk.

Taylor tried to wean off Paxil before becoming pregnant, but she fell into a deep depression. Last year, after she and her husband decided they were ready to start a family, Taylor returned to her doctor, this time asking for an alternative to Paxil. She just couldn’t risk being without an antidepressant. Her doctor recommended Zoloft.

Taylor’s visit to her doctor came just months before new studies suggested Zoloft – and other SSRIs – may be just as dangerous to developing fetuses as Paxil. Taylor says she had no choice but to take the risk. Taylor’s baby was born with pneumonia, a condition doctors didn’t associate with any cause, “but antidepressants never enter(ed) the conversation,” she said. Still, her infant daughter must stay in the NICU until she recovers.

“We’ll leave the hospital days before she will. We’ll drive home with an empty car seat and stare at an empty bassinet,” she writes. “My Zoloft, even if I don’t like it as much as Paxil, will come in handy.”

Source: Babble

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › Mother weighs risks of Zoloft during pregnancy

Pregnant woman and women who are trying to get pregnant are routinely prescribed prenatal vitamins containing at least 1,000 milligrams of folic acid as a way to improve the health of the unborn child. In the mid-1990s, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) took the effort one step further, requiring that folic acid be added to breads, cereals, flours, corn meals, pastas, rice and other grain products. Researchers say that move likely contributed to the 26 percent drop in neural tube defects, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Now they say folic acid also may be tied into the six percent drop in heart defects each year after folic acid was added to grain supplies, researchers say.

While congenital heart defects are rare, such news is encouraging. “If you can reduce such a significant abnormality by doing something as simple as a public health intervention by increasing folic acid in the grain supply and encouraging individuals to take folic acid supplementation, it’s a win-win situation,” said Dr. Diane M. Ashton, deputy medical director of the March of Dimes.

Besides consuming a folic acid supplement or consuming foods high in folic acid, another step a woman can take to improve her chances of having a healthy baby is to discuss with her doctors any medications she is taking. Some drugs, such as SSRI antidepressants like Paxil, have been linked to a an increased risk of overall birth defects, and specifically heart defects.

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › Folic acid may help reduce risk of heart defects in newborns

For the study, researchers observed a group of 300 pregnant women, most of whom did not suffer from depression but some either had a history of depression or reported becoming depressed during pregnancy. Of those observed, some took medication to treat their depression either for part of their pregnancy or for the entire pregnancy; some did not take medication and remained depressed; and some did not take medication and reported being depressed for only part of their pregnancy.

The research found that the women who took medication for the duration of their pregnancy and the women who did not take medication but still suffered with depression had a much higher rate of premature birth (20 percent) than the women who took no medication and recovered from their depression during their pregnancy (4 to 9 percent).

Antidepressants can also carry others risks to unborn babies. A 2005 scientific study showed a link between birth defects in babies born to women who took antidepressants during pregnancy. The recurrence was rare enough that some antidepressants are still considered viable options for pregnant women.

However, one antidepressant showed a greater risk to unborn children in the first trimester over other antidepressants, Paxil. As a result of the study, drug manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline updated the PRECAUTIONS subsection on the labeling for its popular antidepressant Paxil, citing a greater risk for overall birth defects, in particular heart defects.

Women who are pregnant or are considering becoming pregnant should consult with their doctors to determine what depression treatment is best for them.

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › Study: antidepressants, depression linked to preterm birth

Seeking help from a health care provider is vital not only to the mother, but to her unborn child. Depressed mothers-to-be may not have the energy to take care of themselves or seek optimal prenatal care. She may even rely on smoking cigarettes or drinking alcohol to cope, which can have detrimental effects on an unborn child. Health care providers can discuss healthier options, such as group or one-on-one therapy. In some cases, antidepressants may be recommended.

According to the Mayo Clinic, few medications have been proven safe beyond a doubt for use during pregnancy, which is why many doctors advise their patients who are pregnant or are considering pregnancy to wean off most drugs. However, some antidepressants, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), should only be taken during pregnancy after a woman weighs the risks with her doctor because of the possibility of serious birth defects.

Common SSRIs that have previously been prescribed for depression during pregnancy include Celexa, Prozac, Zoloft and Paxil. However, with all those medications there is a possible risk of persistent pulmonary hypertension, or PPHN, in the newborn. The risk is so rare that Celexa, Prozac and Zoloft are still considered options for use during pregnancy.

However, in 2005, a scientific study indicated that women who took Paxil during the first three months of pregnancy had a greater risk of their unborn child developing birth defects – in particular heart defects – than any other antidepressant. As a result of that study, GlaxoSmithKline, makers of Paxil, updated the PRECAUTIONS section of its medication label discouraging use of Paxil during pregnancy.

The Mayo Clinic urges women to consult with their doctors and learn the risks and benefits of antidepressants during pregnancy before making a decision.

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › Mothers-to-be should weigh risks of antidepressants during pregnancy

Christine K had been prescribed a combination of Paxil, Risperdal and Depakote five years prior to becoming pregnant. While pregnant she read that Paxil could be harmful to her unborn baby. She asked her doctor take her off the meds, but he insisted she stay on them.

Christine K did more research on the medications and learned that a scientific study on infants born to women taking antidepressants during the first trimester of pregnancy showed that women who took Paxil had a greater risk of birth defects compared to other antidepressants.

As a result of the study, in 2005, GlaxoSmithKline informed health care professionals that it was updating the precautions section of the label for its antidepressant Paxil to include the risk of birth defects and, in particular, heart defects.

In 2006, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released another Public Health Advisory based on another study that indicated additional risks associated with taking antidepressants during pregnancy including persistent pulmonary hypertention (PPHN), a serious and life-threatening lung condition that occurs soon after birth, omphalocele and craniosynostosis.

Six months into her pregnancy, against her doctor’s orders, Christine K heeded the warning signs she had read about online and weaned herself off Paxil and the other antidepressants. But the damage had already been done. While her son doesn’t have any of the above mentioned severe birth defects, he does experience sleep problems, aversions to eating, and overall poor health.

“In the first three years of his life, this child has needed more medical care and doctor’s appointments than my other three children combined,” she told the Dissident Voice. “All I can do is watch and wait and hope (his medical problems) resolve on their own.”

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › Child is helpless victim of mother’s use of Paxil during pregnancy

What Gibson soon realized was that a warning about heart defects in infants born to women who took Paxil during pregnancy was issued the very month her daughter was born.

“I never would have taken the (Paxil) had I been told,” Gibson told a reporter for The Province.

The long, red scar down the middle of her daughter’s chest is a painful reminder of the condition she was unnecessarily born with. She says her daughter’s heart defect has made the little girl prone to infections and stunted her growth.

In 2005, the FDA issued a warning to pregnant women and their doctors to stay away from Paxil because of the increased risk of heart defects in newborns. The agency fell short of banning the medication for pregnant women but stated that it “is advising patients that this drug should usually not be taken during pregnancy.”

The risk of heart defects among newborns is about 1 percent overall. For infants born to women taking Paxil, that number jumps to 1.5 to 2 percent, according to studies cited by the FDA.

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › Babies born to women taking Paxil at higher risk for heart defects

The families contend that the mothers’ use of Paxil during pregnancy resulted in severe heart defects in their infants and have sued GlaxoSmithKline for failure to warn the public about the dangers of the drug for pregnant women.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recently recommended that pregnant women not use Paxil, according to the plaintiffs’ lawyer, Karen Barth Menzies of Los Angeles.

Two of the plaintiffs are from West Virginia, two from Ohio and one from Nebraska.

Source: Lawyers USA

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › Parents sue Paxil maker for heart defects

Numerous studies have not found an increased risk of major birth defects associated with the use of SSRIs during pregnancy. However, exposure to SSRIs late in pregnancy has been associated with short-term complications in newborns including jitteriness, mild respiratory distress, excessively rapid respiration, weak cry, poor muscle tone, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. Unpublished data regarding the use of Paxil® during the first trimester of pregnancy have raised concerns about an increased risk of congenital heart malformations. Thus, the US Food and Drug Administration issued a public health advisory regarding the use of Paxil® during pregnancy and the manufacturer changed its pregnancy category from C to D. A Category C classification is for drugs that have been shown to harm fetuses in animal studies but have not been adequately studied in humans. A Category D classification means a drug has been found to be harmful to human fetuses.

The potential risk of SSRIs during pregnancy must be weighed against the risk of depression relapse if the medication is discontinued. Untreated depression has its own risks, including low weight gain, alcohol and substance abuse, and sexually transmitted diseases, all of which have negative maternal and fetal health implications. Fetal echocardiography should be considered for women who were exposed to Paxil® in early pregnancy.

ACOG’s Committee on Obstetric Practice emphasizes that decisions about depression treatment should involve the obstetrician and the mental health clinician, along with the patient, ideally prior to pregnancy. However, because approximately 50% of pregnancies are unplanned, preconception planning for women with depression will not always be feasible, and treatment decisions about SSRIs will undoubtedly occur during pregnancy.

Committee Opinion #354, “Treatment with Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors During Pregnancy,” is published in the December 2006 issue of Obstetrics & Gynecology.

Source: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › ACOG Issues Opinion on SSRI Antidepressant Use During Pregnancy

ACOG’s Committee on Obstetric Practice “recommends that treatment with all SSRIs [selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors] or selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors or both during pregnancy be individualized and paroxetine [Paxil] use among pregnant women or women planning to become pregnant be avoided, if possible,” read the statement, which is in the December issue of Obstetrics & Gynecology.

The guidelines come a full year after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration(FDA) issued a warning about possible birth defects associated with Paxil when the drug is taken during the first trimester of pregnancy.

This warning was based on two studies. The first found about a 2 percent risk of heart defects in babies born to mothers who took Paxil early in their pregnancy, compared with a 1 percent risk in the general population.

The second study found that the risk of heart defects was 1.5 percent in babies whose mothers took Paxil in the first three months of pregnancy, compared with 1 percent in babies whose mothers took other antidepressants in the first trimester. The most common defects were cardiovascular.

“Since the FDA warnings a year ago, most ob/gyns have been trying to avoid Paxil during pregnancy,” noted Dr. Jennifer Wu, an obstetrician/gynecologist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. “This is just a formal statement by ACOG.”

The initial FDA warning came in September of 2005. In December of the same year, the FDA instructed Paxil’s maker, GlaxoSmithKline, to reclassify the drug from a Category C to D (a stronger warning) for pregnant women. Category D means studies in pregnant women have demonstrated a risk to the fetus.

Other reports had indicated that SSRIs, the category of antidepressants which includes Paxil as well as Celexa, Prozac and Zoloft, may cause newborns to have withdrawal symptoms.

ACOG acknowledged that these potential problems must be weighed against yet another study which found that pregnant women who discontinue their antidepressant medication are five times more likely to relapse into depression than women who continue with the medication.

“Untreated depression has its own risks, including low weight gain, alcohol and substance abuse, and sexually transmitted diseases, all of which have negative maternal and fetal health implications,” the statement said.

Women of reproductive age have the highest prevalence of major depressive disorders, with ACOG experts estimating that about 1 in 10 will experience a bout of major or minor depression sometime during pregnancy or the postpartum period.

Ideally, these issues should be considered before a woman becomes pregnant, the ACOG panel said. But, given that about half of all pregnancies are not planned, many decisions regarding treatment will inevitably happen after the woman has conceived. Fetal echocardiography, which looks for heart trouble, should be considered for women who were exposed to Paxil in early pregnancy, the statement recommended.

“Women who have certain health problem such as depression really should try to plan their pregnancies with their ob/gyn and psychiatrist,” Wu confirmed. “The major danger will be to women who have an unplanned pregnancy and don’t realize it until they’re two months along. There’s a lot of organ development during that time, and exposure to certain SSRIs may pose some dangers.”

SOURCE: Health Day News

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › Ob/Gyn Group Urges Pregnant Women to Shun Paxil

The lawsuit, filed in Pennsylvania state court, is seeking unspecified damages for failing to warn pregnant women about the risks of taking Paxil.

During the last month of her pregnancy, Vasquez learned, while receiving an ultrasound to determine the sex of her baby, that there was something wrong with his heart.

Since then, Adrian has undergone three open-heart surgeries and now has a pacemaker.

The seriousness of these birth defects is such that, at the very first sign of danger, GSK should have issued a strong warning, said attorney Karen Barth Menzies, who is representing the family.

Adrian will need repeated heart surgeries as he continues to grow and may need artificial replacement valves, and perhaps eventually a heart transplant. His prognosis is unclear, she said.

Menzies added that with 40,000 pregnant women nationwide taking antidepressants, thousands of babies are at risk.

Source: Lawyers USA

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › Paxil Maker Sued Over Child Born with Severe Birth Defects

Results of two early studies reviewed by the FDA showed that women who took Paxil during the first three months of pregnancy were about one and a half to two times as likely to have a baby with a heart defect compared with women who took other antidepressants or women in the general population. Most of the heart defects reported in these studies were of the type known as atrial and ventricular septal defects (holes in the walls of the chambers of the heart). These types of heart defects can range in severity from relatively minor that resolve without treatment to those that cause serious symptoms and need to be repaired surgically. The risk for this type of heart defect is approximately one per cent of births in the general population. In one of the studies with Paxil, women taking the drug had an approximately two per cent risk of having a baby with heart defects, and in the second study, women taking Paxil in the first trimester had an approximate 1.5% risk of having a baby with heart defects.

According to the FDA announcement:

FDA is advising health care professionals to discuss the potential risk of birth defects with patients taking Paxil who plan to become pregnant or are in their first three months of pregnancy. Health care professionals should consider discontinuing Paxil (and switching to another antidepressant if indicated) in these patients. In some patients, the benefits of continuing Paxil may be greater than the potential risk to the fetus. FDA is advising health care professionals not to prescribe Paxil in women who are in the first three months of pregnancy or are planning pregnancy, unless other treatment options are not appropriate.

The manufacturer of Paxil, Glaxo Smith Kline, has changed the product labeling from pregnancy class C to class D, meaning that that studies in pregnant women (controlled or observational) have demonstrated a risk to the fetus. However, the benefits of therapy with Paxil may outweigh the potential risks to the fetus.

It’s important to note that these conclusions are preliminary and are based on early results of two studies. The FDA is collecting additional data and waiting for the final results of these and other studies in order to better characterize and understand the risk for birth defects associated with Paxil. If you’re currently taking Paxil, talk to your doctor if you are pregnant or planning to become pregnant. He or she can advise you on the best course of action for your situation and medical condition

Source: MedicineNet

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › Updated Product Labeling Warns of Birth Defect

FDA is advising patients that this drug should usually not be taken during pregnancy, but for some women who have already been taking Paxil, the benefits of continuing may be greater than the potential risk to the fetus.  Women taking Paxil who are pregnant or plan to become pregnant should talk to their physicians about the potential risks of taking the drug during pregnancy.  Women taking Paxil should not stop taking it without first talking with their physician.

The early results of two studies showed that women who took Paxil during the first three months of pregnancy were about one and a half to two times as likely to have a baby with a heart defect as women who received other antidepressants or women in the general population. Most of the heart defects reported in these studies were atrial and ventricular septal defects (holes in the walls of the chambers of the heart). In general, these types of defects range in severity from those that are minor and may resolve without treatment to those that cause serious symptoms and may need to be repaired surgically.

In one of the studies, the risk of heart defects in babies whose mothers had taken Paxil early in pregnancy was about 2 percent, compared to a 1 percent risk in the whole population. In the other study, the risk of heart defects in babies whose mothers had taken Paxil in the first three months of pregnancy was 1.5 percent, compared to 1 percent in babies whose mothers had taken other antidepressants in the first three months of pregnancy.

FDA has asked the manufacturer, Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK), to change the pregnancy category from C to D, a stronger warning. Category D means that studies in pregnant women (controlled or observational) have demonstrated a risk to the fetus. However, the benefits of therapy may outweigh the potential risks to the fetus.

Based on results of the preliminary data, GSK updated the drug’s labeling in September 2005 to add data from one study. As additional data have become available, the label has now been changed to reflect the latest data from the two studies and to change the pregnancy category.

Source: FDA

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › FDA Advising of Risk of Birth Defects with Paxil

The extent of the heart defects ranged from mild to those that were severe enough to require surgery.

The FDA said that based on the data, it is asking that Paxil’s drug classification be changed from “C” to “D”. Doctors use the classification system to decide whether or not to prescribe a specific drug to a woman who is pregnant.

Despite the warning, the FDA said that Paxil’s benefits may outweigh its risks for certain patients. Paxil is also known by the generic name paroxetine.

The FDA noted that Glaxo (GSK ) had changed its label in September to reflect results from one of the clinical studies. The agency said it now asked the company to update Paxil’s label to now include results from the second study.

In September, Glaxo also sent out letters to health professionals advising of the labeling changes for pregnant women, according to the FDA’s website.

Like many other popular antidepressants, Paxil also carries a warning advising that it can trigger suicidal thoughts in some children and adolescents. The drug is not approved for pediatric use.

Paxil was first approved by the FDA in December 1992.

Source: MarketWatch

SOURCE: Paxil and Pregnancy › FDA strengthens pregnancy warning on Glaxo’s Paxil